Central Composite Design case study in chemical engineering


Case Study: Synthesis of Pharmaceutical Compounds

In the pharmaceutical industry, CCD has been used to optimise the synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).

For example, a study focused on optimising the yield and purity of a drug compound by varying factors such as temperature, reaction time, and reagent concentrations.

  • Objective: Maximise yield and purity of the compound.
  • Factors: Temperature, reaction time, and reagent concentration.
  • Outcome: By using CCD, the researchers identified the optimal conditions that significantly increased the yield and purity of the drug, leading to a more efficient manufacturing process.

Detailed Example: Pharmaceutical Compound Synthesis

Let’s delve deeper into the pharmaceutical compound synthesis example:

Objective: Optimise the yield and purity of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).

Design and Methodology:

  • Factors:
    • Temperature (X1 )
    • Reaction time (X2 )
    • Reagent concentration (X3 )
  • Design: A Central Composite Design (CCD) was chosen to explore the effects of these factors on the yield and purity of the API.
  • Experimental Runs:
    • A full factorial design with centre points and axial points was used.
    • The factorial points were combinations of high and low levels of each factor.
    • Centre points were repetitions at the midpoint to estimate experimental error.
    • Axial points were placed at a distance \alpha from the centre along each factor axis.

Results and Optimisation:

  • A quadratic model was fitted to the data, capturing linear, interaction, and quadratic effects.
  • The model was used to generate response surfaces and contour plots to visualise the effects of the factors.
  • Optimisation techniques were applied to find the conditions that maximised the yield and purity.
  • Validation experiments confirmed the predicted optimal conditions, resulting in a significant improvement in the manufacturing process.

Outcome: The application of CCD in this case led to a substantial increase in the yield and purity of the API, demonstrating the power of this methodology in optimising complex processes.

Detailed Example: Optimisation of Pharmaceutical Compound Synthesis

Objective: Optimise the yield and purity of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).

Design and Methodology

  1. Identification of Factors and Levels:
    • Factors:
      • Temperature (X1 )
      • Reaction time (X2 )
      • Reagent concentration (X3 )
    • Levels:
      • For CCD, each factor is typically studied at five levels: -\alpha, -1, 0, +1, +\alpha . The value of \alpha ensures rotatability and is calculated based on the number of factors.
  2. Design of Experiments:

    • Factorial Points: These are combinations of high (+1) and low (-1) levels for each factor.
    • Centre Points: These are repetitions at the midpoint (0) of each factor. They help in estimating the experimental error and checking the adequacy of the model.
    • Axial Points: These points are placed at a distance \alpha from the centre along each axis to allow estimation of curvature.

    The factorial and axial points create a design matrix that guides the experimental runs.

  3. Conducting Experiments:
    • The experiments are conducted according to the design matrix.
    • For each run, the yield and purity of the API are measured.
  4. Fitting the Model:
    • A second-order polynomial model is fitted to the data: Y = \beta_0 + \beta_1X1 + \beta_2X2 + \beta_3X3 + \beta_{11}X1^2 + \beta_{22}X2^2 + \beta_{33}X3^2 + \beta_{12}X1X2 + \beta_{13}X1X3 + \beta_{23}X2X3
    • Here, Y represents the response (yield or purity) and the other factors are the regression coefficients to be estimated.
  5. Analysis and Model Adequacy Checking:
    • ANOVA (Analysis of Variance): Used to test the significance of the model and individual coefficients.
    • Residual Analysis: Check for normality and independence of residuals to validate model assumptions.
    • Lack-of-Fit Test: Ensures the model adequately fits the data.
  6. Optimisation:
    • Response Surface and Contour Plots: Visualise the relationship between factors and the response.
    • Numerical Optimisation: Techniques such as gradient descent or the desirability function are used to find the optimal conditions.
    • Validation: Conduct experiments at the predicted optimal conditions to verify the model’s accuracy.

Results and Optimisation

  1. ANOVA Results:
    • The ANOVA table shows significant p-values for the model and coefficients, indicating a good fit.
  2. Response Surface and Contour Plots:
    • Plots reveal the interaction effects between temperature, reaction time, and reagent concentration on the yield and purity of the API.
  3. Optimal Conditions:
    • Using the fitted model, the optimal conditions for maximum yield and purity are identified. For instance:
      • Temperature: 75^\circ C
      • Reaction Time: 120 minutes
      • Reagent Concentration: 0.5 M
  4. Validation:
    • Validation experiments are conducted at these optimal settings.
    • Results confirm the predicted improvement, with yield increasing by 20% and purity by 15% .

Outcome

The application of CCD in this case led to a substantial increase in the yield and purity of the API, demonstrating the power of this methodology in optimising complex processes. This improvement not only enhances the efficiency of the manufacturing process but also reduces costs and ensures higher quality of the final product.

Discover more from Product Development Engineers Ltd

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading